The application sends user credentials as URL parameters instead of POST bodies, making it vulnerable to information gathering.

For failed login attempts, the application returns different error messages depending on whether the login failed due to an incorrect password or a non-existing username. This allows an attacker to guess usernames until they find an existing one.

The product does not implement sufficient measures to prevent multiple failed authentication attempts within a short time frame, making it susceptible to brute-force attacks.

The web application is susceptible to cross-site-scripting attacks. An attacker who can create new dashboard widgets can inject malicious JavaScript code into the Transform Function which will be executed when the widget receives data from its data source.

A remote unauthorized attacker may gather sensitive information of the application, due to missing authorization of configuration settings of the product.

All communication with the REST API is unencrypted (HTTP), allowing an attacker to intercept traffic between an actor and the webserver. This leads to the possibility of information gathering and downloading media files.

Files in the source code contain login credentials for the admin user and the property configuration password, allowing an attacker to get full access to the application.

Due to missing authorization of an API endpoint, unauthorized users can send HTTP GET requests to gather sensitive information. An attacker could also send HTTP POST requests to modify the log files’ root path as well as the TCP ports the service is running on, leading to a Denial of Service attack.

An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 17.7 before 17.10.8, 17.11 before 17.11.4, and 18.0 before 18.0.2, allow an attacker to trigger an infinite redirect loop, potentially leading to a denial of service condition.

An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 17.9 before 17.10.7, 17.11 before 17.11.3, and 18.0 before 18.0.1. It was possible for authenticated users to access arbitrary compliance frameworks, leading to unauthorized data disclosure.