Description
In the OpenSSL compatibility layer implementation, the function RAND_poll() was not behaving as expected and leading to the potential for predictable values returned from RAND_bytes() after fork() is called. This can lead to weak or predictable random numbers generated in applications that are both using RAND_bytes() and doing fork() operations. This only affects applications explicitly calling RAND_bytes() after fork() and does not affect any internal TLS operations. Although RAND_bytes() documentation in OpenSSL calls out not being safe for use with fork() without first calling RAND_poll(), an additional code change was also made in wolfSSL to make RAND_bytes() behave similar to OpenSSL after a fork() call without calling RAND_poll(). Now the Hash-DRBG used gets reseeded after detecting running in a new process. If making use of RAND_bytes() and calling fork() we recommend updating to the latest version of wolfSSL. Thanks to Per Allansson from Appgate for the report.
INFO
Published Date :
2025-07-18T22:34:23.849Z
Last Modified :
2025-07-21T15:00:21.780Z
Source :
wolfSSL
AFFECTED PRODUCTS
The following products are affected by CVE-2025-7394 vulnerability.
| Vendors | Products |
|---|---|
| Wolfssl |
|
REFERENCES
Here, you will find a curated list of external links that provide in-depth information to CVE-2025-7394.