Description

In the OpenSSL compatibility layer implementation, the function RAND_poll() was not behaving as expected and leading to the potential for predictable values returned from RAND_bytes() after fork() is called. This can lead to weak or predictable random numbers generated in applications that are both using RAND_bytes() and doing fork() operations. This only affects applications explicitly calling RAND_bytes() after fork() and does not affect any internal TLS operations. Although RAND_bytes() documentation in OpenSSL calls out not being safe for use with fork() without first calling RAND_poll(), an additional code change was also made in wolfSSL to make RAND_bytes() behave similar to OpenSSL after a fork() call without calling RAND_poll(). Now the Hash-DRBG used gets reseeded after detecting running in a new process. If making use of RAND_bytes() and calling fork() we recommend updating to the latest version of wolfSSL. Thanks to Per Allansson from Appgate for the report.

INFO

Published Date :

2025-07-18T22:34:23.849Z

Last Modified :

2025-07-21T15:00:21.780Z

Source :

wolfSSL
AFFECTED PRODUCTS

The following products are affected by CVE-2025-7394 vulnerability.

Vendors Products
Wolfssl
  • Wolfssl
REFERENCES

Here, you will find a curated list of external links that provide in-depth information to CVE-2025-7394.

CVSS Vulnerability Scoring System

Detailed values of each vector for above chart.
Attack Vector
Attack Complexity
Attack Requirements
Privileges Required
User Interaction
VS Confidentiality
VS Integrity
VS Availability
SS Confidentiality
SS Integrity
SS Availability
Detailed values of each vector for above chart.
Attack Vector
Attack Complexity
Privileges Required
User Interaction
Scope
Confidentiality Impact
Integrity Impact
Availability Impact